I don’t think your logic makes sense. The point isn’t the ratio. The point is the likelihood of a mutation. The point came from a geneticist. No disrespect but their point of view is more credible to me than yours. I don’t follow your other point about “enlarging.” The numbers are the numbers and the ones I am aware of I stated. I’m not advocating in this article. The science is the science, people can make of it what they will.